Advantages/Disadvantages of different implementations for Comparing Objects using .NET
Posted
by Kevin Crowell
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Kevin Crowell
Published on 2010-03-21T18:56:59Z
Indexed on
2010/03/22
2:41 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 334
This questions involves 2 different implementations of essentially the same code.
First, using delegate to create a Comparison method that can be used as a parameter when sorting a collection of objects:
class Foo
{
public static Comparison<Foo> BarComparison = delegate(Foo foo1, Foo foo2)
{
return foo1.Bar.CompareTo(foo2.Bar);
};
}
I use the above when I want to have a way of sorting a collection of Foo objects in a different way than my CompareTo function offers. For example:
List<Foo> fooList = new List<Foo>();
fooList.Sort(BarComparison);
Second, using IComparer:
public class BarComparer : IComparer<Foo>
{
public int Compare(Foo foo1, Foo foo2)
{
return foo1.Bar.CompareTo(foo2.Bar);
}
}
I use the above when I want to do a binary search for a Foo object in a collection of Foo objects. For example:
BarComparer comparer = new BarComparer();
List<Foo> fooList = new List<Foo>();
Foo foo = new Foo();
int index = fooList.BinarySearch(foo, comparer);
My questions are:
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of these implementations?
- What are some more ways to take advantage of each of these implementations?
- Is there a way to combine these implementations in such a way that I do not need to duplicate the code?
- Can I achieve both a binary search and an alternative collection sort using only 1 of these implementations?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner