is it good design practice to only have a parameterless base class constructor?

Posted by T. Webster on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by T. Webster
Published on 2010-03-22T15:01:31Z Indexed on 2010/03/22 15:11 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 309

Filed under:
|
|

In base class constructors I always see a parameterless constructor, like so:

   public abstract BaseClass {...
protected BaseClass() { }
...}

but is it acceptable design to include a parameter in the base class constructor?

   public abstract BaseClass {...
protected BaseClass(string initObj) { }
...}

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c#

Related posts about design