Multiple branch merges, stick with Subversion or move to Mercurial or Git?
Posted
by casualcoder
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by casualcoder
Published on 2010-03-10T02:50:41Z
Indexed on
2010/03/22
23:41 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 129
Given a situation where there are three branches, A, B and C, where A is merged to both B and C on a regular basis. From time to time B is merged to C. With Subversion, B apparently must be removed and recreated after every merge to C. This raises groans from colleagues, but would any alternative do any better? It would seem to me that Mercurial would not. Perhaps Git?
Does anyone else run into this problem?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner