Weak event handler model for use with lambdas

Posted by Benjol on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Benjol
Published on 2009-11-17T07:49:41Z Indexed on 2010/03/22 8:51 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 441

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

OK, so this is more of an answer than a question, but after asking this question, and pulling together the various bits from Dustin Campbell, Egor, and also one last tip from the 'IObservable/Rx/Reactive framework', I think I've worked out a workable solution for this particular problem. It may be completely superseded by IObservable/Rx/Reactive framework, but only experience will show that.

I've deliberately created a new question, to give me space to explain how I got to this solution, as it may not be immediately obvious.

There are many related questions, most telling you you can't use inline lambdas if you want to be able to detach them later:

And it is true that if YOU want to be able to detach them later, you need to keep a reference to your lambda. However, if you just want the event handler to detach itself when your subscriber falls out of scope, this answer is for you.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c#

Related posts about .NET