"Access 2002 vs SQL Server 200*" as DB for sharepoint

Posted by Jake on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Jake
Published on 2010-03-23T01:21:03Z Indexed on 2010/03/23 1:21 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 389

Filed under:
|
|
|

I work with a team that has a sharepoint site currently runnning and its lists are linked to an access DB. My question is really on the investment level, what would be the reasons to upgrade DB to sharepoint if only a few 100 users access this site. Is there a real benefit to replacing the DB with a version of SQL Server, escpecially if about to replace Access 2002 with 2007 some day. I know SQL Server can handle more memory and traffic for more users, but I'm looking for more reasons than that if there are any.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about ms-access

Related posts about sql