Load-balancer options

Posted by toolkit on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by toolkit
Published on 2009-05-22T14:36:26Z Indexed on 2010/03/23 12:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 567

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

I am looking at a number of possible options for load-balancing.

So far, I am constrained to the following options:

  • DNS server load-balancer, balancing to a cluster of tomcat servers, with terracotta for session replication. Pros - don't have to buy new kit. Cons - DNS lb can keep directing to a broken server.

  • Hardware load-balancer, direct to cluster of tomcat servers. Pros - could have second box for failover lb. Cons - expense.

  • Apache server load-balancer. Pros - apache's lb polls for broken servers. Cons - apache server is single point of failure, plus need to buy another server.

Are there any other options I should consider?

Thanks.

Update: Thanks for all the answers so far +1's all round. Not accepting an answer yet, to keep more ideas coming.

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about load-balancer

Related posts about dns