Simplifying Testing through design considerations while utilizing dependency injection

Posted by Adam Driscoll on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Adam Driscoll
Published on 2010-03-23T03:06:47Z Indexed on 2010/03/23 3:11 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 320

Filed under:

unit-testing

|

mocking

|

dependency-injection

|

design

We are a few months into a green-field project to rework the Logic and Business layers of our product. By utilizing MEF (dependency injection) we have achieved high levels of code coverage and I believe that we have a pretty solid product. As we have been working through some of the more complex logic I have found it increasingly difficult to unit test.

We are utilizing the CompositionContainer to query for types required by these complex algorithms. My unit tests are sometimes difficult to follow due to the lengthy mock object setup process that must take place, just right, to allow for certain circumstances to be verified. My unit tests often take me longer to write than the code that I'm trying to test.

I realize this is not only an issue with dependency injection but with design as a whole. Is poor method design or lack of composition to blame for my overly complex tests? I've tried base classing tests, creating commonly used mock objects and ensuring that I utilize the container as much as possible to ease this issue but my tests always end up quite complex and hard to debug. What are some tips that you've seen to keep such tests concise, readable, and effective?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about unit-testing

Unit testing best practices for a unit testing newbie

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
In recent years, I have only written small components for people in larger projects or small tools. I have never written a unit test and it always seems like learning how to write them and actually making one takes a lot longer than simply firing up the program and testing for real. I am just about… >>> More
About unit testing a function in the zend framework and unit testing in general

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hello people, I am diving into the world of unit testing. And i am sort of lost. I learned today that unit testing is testing if a function works. I wanted to test the following function: public function getEventById($id) { return $this->getResource('Event')->getEventById($id); } So… >>> More
Unit testing a database connection and general questions on database-dependent code and unit testing

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, If I have a method which establishes a database connection, how could this method be tested? Returning a bool in the event of a successful connection is one way, but is that the best way? From a testability method, is it best to have the connection method as one method and the method to get… >>> More
What is the objective of unit testing?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I've been working with C# for the last 2 years, and I've never done any unit testing. I just need to know what the objective of unit testing is. What kind of results do we expect from unit testing? Is code quality checked by unit testing? In my view, unit testing is the job of testers; if that is… >>> More
Unit testing newbie team needs to unit test

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I'm working with a new team that has historically not done ANY unit testing. My goal is for the team to eventually employ TDD (Test Driven Development) as their natural process. But since TDD is such a radical mind shift for a non-unit testing team I thought I would just start off with writing unit… >>> More

Related posts about mocking

Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start let’s first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name… >>> More
Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start lets first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name { get;… >>> More
Auto Mocking using JustMock

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Auto mocking containers are designed to reduce the friction of keeping unit test beds in sync with the code being tested as systems are updated and evolve over time. This is one sentence how you define auto mocking. Of course this is a more or less formal. In a more informal way auto mocking containers… >>> More
not using partial mocking? do they also mean in web-app?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Im learning Mockito and in chapter 16 they say you should not use partial mocking in new system. I disagree, for example in one of my actions i use partial mocking for static framework methods, sql calls, etc. I extracted the stuff into methods and then mock it in tests. Most of those methods are… >>> More
Talks Submitted for Ann Arbor Day of .NET 2010

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Just submitted my session abstracts for Ann Arbor's Day of .NET 2010. Getting up to speed with .NET 3.5 -- Just in time for 4.0! Yes, C# 4.0 is just around the corner. But if you haven't had the chance to use C# 3.5 extensively, this session will start from the ground up with the new… >>> More