Developer certificate vs purchased certificate for WCF

Posted by RemotecUk on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by RemotecUk
Published on 2010-03-24T09:24:12Z Indexed on 2010/03/24 9:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 844

Filed under:
|
|

I understsand that if I want to use authentication in WCF then I need to install a certificate on my server which WCF will use to encrypt data passing between my server and client.

For development purposes I believe I can use the makecert.exe util. to make a development certificate.

What is the worst that can happen if I use this certificate on the production environment?

and...

Why cant I use this certificate on the production environment?

and ...

What is the certificate actually going to do in this scenario?

[Edit: Added another question]

finally...

In a scenario where the website has a certificate installed to provide HTTPS support can the same certificate be used for the WCF services as well?

Note on my application: Its a NetTCP client and server service. The users will log in using the same username and password which they use for the website which is passed in clear text. I would be happy to pass the u/n + p/w in cleartext to WCF but this isnt allowed by the framework and a certificate must be in place. However, I dont want to buy an certificate due to budget constraints!

(Sorry for the possibly stupid question but I really dont understand this so would welcome some help with this).

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about certificate

Related posts about wcf