Must Dependency Injection come at the expense of Encapsulation?
Posted
by urig
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by urig
Published on 2009-06-17T06:58:01Z
Indexed on
2010/03/24
0:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 421
If I understand correctly, the typical mechanism for Dependency Injection is to inject either through a class' constructor or through a public property (member) of the class.
This exposes the dependency being injected and violates the OOP principle of encapsulation.
Am I correct in identifying this tradeoff? How do you deal with this issue?
Please also see my answer to my own question below.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner