If the size of the (accessible) RAM is limited, why isn't the hard disk?

Posted by sub on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by sub
Published on 2010-03-25T16:59:16Z Indexed on 2010/03/25 17:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 292

When the number of possible RAM adresses is limited by the computer architecture (32/64 bit), why isn't the size of the hard disk limited?

Or is it limited? If yes, what would be the highest possible size of a hard-disk for a 32-bit computer?

How are the adresses of hard-disks handled then?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about ram

Related posts about computer-architecture