If the size of the (accessible) RAM is limited, why isn't the hard disk?
Posted
by sub
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by sub
Published on 2010-03-25T16:59:16Z
Indexed on
2010/03/25
17:03 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 292
When the number of possible RAM adresses is limited by the computer architecture (32/64 bit), why isn't the size of the hard disk limited?
Or is it limited? If yes, what would be the highest possible size of a hard-disk for a 32-bit computer?
How are the adresses of hard-disks handled then?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner