Images in database vs file system

Posted by Jesse on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Jesse
Published on 2010-03-25T17:10:22Z Indexed on 2010/03/25 17:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 361

We have a project coming up where we will be building a whole backend CMS system that will power our entire extranet and intranet with one package. The question I have been trying to find an answer to is which is better: storing images in the database (SQL Server 2005) so we may have integrity, single replication plan, etc OR storing on the file system?

One issue we have is that we have multiple servers load balanced that require to have the same data at all times. As of now we have SQL replication taking care of that but file replication seems to be a little tougher. Another concern we have is that we would like to have multiple resolutions of the same image, we are not sure if creating and storing each version on the file system would be best or maybe dynamically pulling and creating the resolution image we would like upon request.

Our concerns are the with the following:

  • Data integrity
  • Data replication
  • Multiple resolutions
  • Speed of database vs file system
  • Overhead load of database vs file system
  • Data management and backup

Does anyone have a similar situation or have any input on what would be recommended? Thanks in advance for the help!

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about sql

Related posts about database