What features of interpreted languages can a compiled one not have?
Posted
by sub
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by sub
Published on 2010-03-25T15:17:43Z
Indexed on
2010/03/25
15:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 284
Interpreted languages are usually more high-level and therefore have features as dynamic typing (including creating new variables dynamically without declaration), the infamous eval
and many many other features that make a programmer's life easier - but why can't compiled languages have these as well?
I don't mean languages like Java that run on a VM, but those that compile to binary like C(++).
I'm not going to make a list now but if you are going to ask which features I mean, please look into what PHP, Python, Ruby etc. have to offer.
- Which common features of interpreted languages can't/don't/do exist in compiled languages? Why?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner