Can immutable be a memory hog?

Posted by ciscoheat on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by ciscoheat
Published on 2010-03-26T23:18:51Z Indexed on 2010/03/26 23:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 443

Filed under:

immutable

|

functional-programming

|

memory

Let's say we have a memory-intensive class like an Image, with chainable methods like Resize() and ConvertTo().

If this class is immutable, won't it take a huge amount of memory when I start doing things like i.Resize(500, 800).Rotate(90).ConvertTo(Gif), compared to a mutable one which modifies itself? How to handle a situation like this in a functional language?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about immutable

Mutable class as a child of an immutable class

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I want to have immutable Java objects like this (strongly simplyfied): class Immutable { protected String name; public Immutable(String name) { this.name = name; } public String getName() { return name; } } In some cases the object should not only be readable… >>> More
Why are copy constructors unnecessary for immutable objects?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Why are copy constructors unnecessary for immutable objects? Please explain this for me. >>> More
Should this immutable struct be a mutable class?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I showed this struct to a fellow programmer and they felt that it should be a mutable class. They felt it is inconvenient not to have null references and the ability to alter the object as required. I would really like to know if there are any other reasons to make this a mutable class. [Serializable] public… >>> More
why copyconstructor unnecessary for immutable objects?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
why copyconstructor unnecessary for immutable objects?.Please clarify me. >>> More
What's the best name for a non-mutating "add" method on an immutable collection?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Sorry for the waffly title - if I could come up with a concise title, I wouldn't have to ask the question. Suppose I have an immutable list type. It has an operation Foo(x) which returns a new immutable list with the specified argument as an extra element at the end. So to build up a list of strings… >>> More

Related posts about functional-programming

Introducing functional programming constructs in non-functional programming languages

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
This question has been going through my mind quite a lot lately and since I haven't found a convincing answer to it I would like to know if other users of this site have thought about it as well. In the recent years, even though OOP is still the most popular programming paradigm, functional programming… >>> More
Functional programming constructs in non-functional programming languages

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
This question has been going through my mind quite a lot lately and since I haven't found a convincing answer to it I would like to know if other users of this site have thought about it as well. In the recent years, even though OOP is still the most popular programming paradigm, functional programming… >>> More
Does functional programming mandate new naming conventions?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I recently started studying functional programming using Haskell and came upon this article on the official Haskell wiki: How to read Haskell. The article claims that short variable names such as x, xs, and f are fitting for Haskell code, because of conciseness and abstraction. In essence, it claims… >>> More
pitfalls/disadvantages of functional programming

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
When would you NOT want to use functional programming? What is it not so good at? I am more looking for disadvantages of the paradigm as a whole, not things like "not widely used", or "no good debugger available". Those answers may be correct as of now, but they deal with FP being a new concept (an… >>> More
Should functional programming be taught before imperative programming?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
It seems to me that functional programming is a great thing. It eliminates state and makes it much easier to automatically make code run in parallel. Many programmers who were first taught imperative programming styles find it very difficult to learn functional programming, because it is so different… >>> More