How much more efficient is one big image rather than many small images. Facebook style.
Posted
by Jesse Gibbs
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Jesse Gibbs
Published on 2009-08-26T12:48:10Z
Indexed on
2010/03/26
9:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 155
So I was looking at the facebook HTML with firebug, and I chanced upon this image and came to the conclusion that facebook uses this large image (with tricky image positioning code) rather than many small ones for its graphical elements. Is this more efficient than storing many small images?
Can anybody give any clues as to why facebook would do this.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner