singleton pattern in java- lazy Intialization
Posted
by flash
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by flash
Published on 2010-03-26T08:29:44Z
Indexed on
2010/03/26
8:33 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 153
public static MySingleton getInstance() {
if (_instance==null) {
synchronized (MySingleton.class) {
_instance = new MySingleton();
}
}
return _instance;
}
1.is there a flaw with the above implementation of the getInstance method? 2.What is the difference between the two implementations.?
public static synchronized MySingleton getInstance() {
if (_instance==null) {
_instance = new MySingleton();
}
return _instance;
}
I have seen a lot of answers on the singleton pattern in stackoverflow but the question I have posted is to know mainly difference of 'synchronize' at method and block level in this particular case.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner