Capistrano, Mercurial and branches
Posted
by J. Pablo Fernández
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by J. Pablo Fernández
Published on 2010-03-27T08:30:51Z
Indexed on
2010/03/27
8:33 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 555
It is my understanding that although Mercurial has support from branches, the community generally clone repos instead of creating branches. Similar to the Darcs model, unlike the Git model.
I'm deploying a Ruby on Rails app with Capistrano and there I'd like to separate the production from the development branch. Should I point Capistrano to a different repo or should I use branches?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner