What does Visual Studio 2008 do when I add an assembly reference?

Posted by tk-421 on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by tk-421
Published on 2010-03-27T17:54:47Z Indexed on 2010/03/27 18:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 330

Filed under:

visual-studio-2008

|

assemblies

|

ASP.NET

When I add a reference to an assembly (living in the GAC) to web.config in an ASP.NET project, what does Visual Studio do?

[This is related to an earlier question pertaining to BusinessObjects: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2379615/ ]

When I add "CrystalDecisions.Enterprise" and "CrystalDecisions.Enterprise.Framework" to the assemblies element in web.config, VS thinks long and hard about it, locking me out for a couple of minutes while it scrutinizes the newcomers.

What is it doing during this time? I Googled this but came up empty.

I can make some educated guesses (IntelliSense integration, perhaps?) but would ideally like to find some documentation describing exactly what's going on.

Ultimately I'm hoping to learn why these BO references are making VS take several minutes to open my projects (I struck out on the SAP forums).

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about visual-studio-2008

Server.transfer causing HttpException

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am developing a C#/SQL ASP.NET web application in VS 2008. Currently I am using the Server.Transfer method to transfer control from one ASPX.CS file to another ASPX file. The first time through, this works. But after control is transferred to this new file it encounters a condition: if (restart… >>> More
Using Visual Studio 2008 to Assemble, Link, Debug, and Execute MASM 6.11 Assembly Code

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I would like to use Visual Studio 2008 to the greatest extent possible while effectively compiling/linking/building/etc code as if all these build processes were being done by the tools provided with MASM 6.11. The exact version of MASM does not matter, so long as it's within the 6.x range, as that… >>> More
Visual Studio 2008: Don't deploy SQL Server Compact 3.5 when debugging

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I'm using VS2008 to create a Compact Framework application for a Windows CE 5.0 device (Datalogic Kyman). I'm using SQL Server Compact 3.5 in my application. However, I'm debugging on a Kyman that still has Windows CE 4.2 installed (attached via USB using Mobile Device Center). My problem: VS2008… >>> More
Missing help files for Microsoft.WindowsMobile in Visual Studio 2008 help system

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I've just installed the Windows Mobile 6.5.3 DTK, both standard and professional. Before that I had the standard and professional Windows Mobile 6 SDKs. All Windows Mobile help pages are missing in Visual Studio 2008's help system - in particular everything in the Microsoft.WindowsMobile namespace… >>> More
Visual Studio 2008: Start custom build target via project/solution context menu - without add-in

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have a custom build target in a visual studio 2008 c# project. Is there a simple way to add a context menu item to the project, so that the custom build target can be executed via the ide? The build target is not integrated into the default build process and has to be started by hand. This step… >>> More

Related posts about assemblies

Removing all assemblies from <compilation><assemblies> in ASP.NET 4 web.config

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I removed all the 'add' elements in the compilation/assemblies element. So initially in my application's root web.config file: <compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.0"> <assemblies> <add assembly="System.Web.Abstractions, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35"/> … >>> More
How to merge your referenced assemblies into the output assembly for improved usability

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Something we've been doing in moq since the very beginning is to have a single assembly as output: Moq.dll. This reduces the clutter for users and lets them focus on what they need from our library, rather than getting the noise of whatever third-party (or internal) libraries we use to implement it… >>> More
Back to Basics: When does a .NET Assembly Dependency get loaded

as seen on West-Wind - Search for 'West-Wind'
When we work on typical day to day applications, it's easy to forget some of the core features of the .NET framework. For me personally it's been a long time since I've learned about some of the underlying CLR system level services even though I rely on them on a daily basis. I often think only about… >>> More
.NET Reactor - How to Protect 64-bit Assemblies

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have build 64-bit (x64) versions of some assemblies and am trying to obfuscate them with .NET Reactor, which claims to have 64-bit support. However, even if I disable all protection and locking options .NET Reactor is always producing 32-bit assemblies! Does anyone know how to get .NET Reactor… >>> More
Is there a "max" number of assemblies for a .net app

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Quite a few apps support plugins Are there any downsides to having a large # of plugins ? Is there a sweet spot beyond which there's a performance degradation perhaps ? What's the largest # of assemblies you've seen loaded in an app ? >>> More