"C variable type sizes are machine dependent." Is it really true? signed & unsigned numbers ;
Posted
by claws
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by claws
Published on 2010-03-28T14:57:39Z
Indexed on
2010/03/28
15:03 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 272
Hello,
I've been told that C types are machine dependent. Today I wanted to verify it.
void legacyTypes()
{
/* character types */
char k_char = 'a';
//Signedness --> signed & unsigned
signed char k_char_s = 'a';
unsigned char k_char_u = 'a';
/* integer types */
int k_int = 1; /* Same as "signed int" */
//Signedness --> signed & unsigned
signed int k_int_s = -2;
unsigned int k_int_u = 3;
//Size --> short, _____, long, long long
short int k_s_int = 4;
long int k_l_int = 5;
long long int k_ll_int = 6;
/* real number types */
float k_float = 7;
double k_double = 8;
}
I compiled it on a 32-Bit machine using minGW C compiler
_legacyTypes:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
subl $48, %esp
movb $97, -1(%ebp) # char
movb $97, -2(%ebp) # signed char
movb $97, -3(%ebp) # unsigned char
movl $1, -8(%ebp) # int
movl $-2, -12(%ebp)# signed int
movl $3, -16(%ebp) # unsigned int
movw $4, -18(%ebp) # short int
movl $5, -24(%ebp) # long int
movl $6, -32(%ebp) # long long int
movl $0, -28(%ebp)
movl $0x40e00000, %eax
movl %eax, -36(%ebp)
fldl LC2
fstpl -48(%ebp)
leave
ret
I compiled the same code on 64-Bit processor (Intel Core 2 Duo) on GCC (linux)
legacyTypes:
.LFB2:
.cfi_startproc
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_offset 6, -16
.cfi_def_cfa_register 6
movb $97, -1(%rbp) # char
movb $97, -2(%rbp) # signed char
movb $97, -3(%rbp) # unsigned char
movl $1, -12(%rbp) # int
movl $-2, -16(%rbp)# signed int
movl $3, -20(%rbp) # unsigned int
movw $4, -6(%rbp) # short int
movq $5, -32(%rbp) # long int
movq $6, -40(%rbp) # long long int
movl $0x40e00000, %eax
movl %eax, -24(%rbp)
movabsq $4620693217682128896, %rax
movq %rax, -48(%rbp)
leave
ret
Observations
char, signed char, unsigned char, int, unsigned int, signed int, short int, unsigned short int, signed short int all occupy same no. of bytes on both 32-Bit & 64-Bit Processor.
The only change is in
long int
&long long int
both of these occupy 32-bit on 32-bit machine & 64-bit on 64-bit machine.And also the pointers, which take 32-bit on 32-bit CPU & 64-bit on 64-bit CPU.
Questions:
- I cannot say, what the books say is wrong. But I'm missing something here. What exactly does "Variable types are machine dependent mean?"
- As you can see, There is no difference between instructions for unsigned & signed numbers. Then how come the range of numbers that can be addressed using both is different?
- I was reading http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2511246/how-to-maintain-fixed-size-of-c-variable-types-over-different-machines I didn't get the purpose of the question or their answers. What maintaining fixed size? They all are the same. I didn't understand how those answers are going to ensure the same size.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner