Is System.AddIn mostly about making it easier to use Remoting or does it make it harder to do so?

Posted by MatthewMartin on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by MatthewMartin
Published on 2009-11-15T05:26:40Z Indexed on 2010/03/28 18:13 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 352

It takes at least 7 assemblies and restricting my AddIn's data model to data types that remoting can deal with before the appdomain isolation features begin to work. It is so complex! The System.AddIn teams blog implies to me they were trying to re-create a mental model of COM, a model I never understood very well in the first place and am not sold on the benefits. (If COM is so good why's it dead?-rhetorical question.) If I don't need to mirror or interop with legacy COM (like VSTO does using System.AddIn), is it possible to just create some classes that load load in a new AppDomain?

I can write the discovery code my self, I've done it before and a naive implementation is pretty fast because I'm not like iterating over the assemblies in the GAC!

So my specific question is, can I get the AppDomain isolation that AddIns provide with a few code Remoting snippets, and what would those be?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about system.addin

Related posts about maf