Should image size be defined in the img tag height/width attributes or in CSS?
Posted
by Benjamin Manns
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Benjamin Manns
Published on 2010-03-10T04:25:49Z
Indexed on
2010/03/28
2:03 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 309
Is it better coding practice to define an images size in the img
tag's width
and height
attributes?
<img src="images/academia_vs_business.png" width="740" height="382" alt="" />
Or in the CSS style with width/height?
<img src="images/academia_vs_business.png" style="width:740px; height:382px;" alt="" />
Or both?
<img src="images/academia_vs_business.png" width="740" height="382" style="width:740px; height:382px" alt="" />
© Stack Overflow or respective owner