ASP.NET MVC, Url Routing: Maximum Path (URL) Length
Posted
by Martin Aatmaa
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Martin Aatmaa
Published on 2009-07-26T22:29:45Z
Indexed on
2010/03/30
18:53 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 549
The Scenario
I have an application where we took the good old query string URL structure:
?x=1&y=2&z=3&a=4&b=5&c=6
and changed it into a path structure:
/x/1/y/2/z/3/a/4/b/5/c/6
We're using ASP.NET MVC and (naturally) ASP.NET routing.
The Problem
The problem is that our parameters are dynamic, and there is (theoretically) no limit to the amount of parameters that we need to accommodate for.
This is all fine until we got hit by the following train:
HTTP Error 400.0 - Bad Request ASP.NET detected invalid characters in the URL.
IIS would throw this error when our URL got past a certain length.
The Nitty Gritty
Here's what we found out:
This is not an IIS problem
IIS does have a max path length limit, but the above error is not this.
Learn dot iis dot net How to Use Request Filtering Section "Filter Based on Request Limits"
If the path was too long for IIS, it would throw a 404.14, not a 400.0.
Besides, the IIS max path (and query) length are configurable:
<requestLimits
maxAllowedContentLength="30000000"
maxUrl="260"
maxQueryString="25"
/>
This is an ASP.NET Problem
After some poking around:
IIS Forums Thread: ASP.NET 2.0 maximum URL length? http://forums.iis.net/t/1105360.aspx
it turns out that this is an ASP.NET (well, .NET really) problem.
The shit of the matter is that, as far as I can tell, ASP.NET cannot handle paths longer than 260 characters.
The nail in the coffin in that this is confirmed by Phil the Haack himself:
Stack Overflow ASP.NET url MAX_PATH limit Question ID 265251
The Question
So what's the question?
The question is, how big of a limitation is this?
For my app, it's a deal killer. For most apps, it's probably a non-issue.
What about disclosure? No where where ASP.NET Routing is mentioned have I ever heard a peep about this limitation. The fact that ASP.NET MVC uses ASP.NET routing makes the impact of this even bigger.
What do you think?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner