Naming lossless more appropriate

Posted by LarsOn on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by LarsOn
Published on 2010-03-30T04:47:50Z Indexed on 2010/03/30 4:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 520

Filed under:

lossless

|

lossless-compression

Starting just discussing the naming first ignoring tech details, lossless is a negative and double negative word for one good reason should get named more appropriate: Lossless also matches nothing. When naming like all intact or likewise matches something in a manner more physical like sounds are.

Then more technically stated that a copy might contain more information than the original. Does method as such have a name, if so what do I refer to, can we name it if you please or just discuss related handling.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about lossless

Improving lossless codecs [closed]

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Improve the name to match positively Starting just discussing the naming first ignoring tech details, lossless is a negative and double negative word for one good reason should get named more appropriate: Lossless also matches nothing. When naming like all intact or likewise matches something in a… >>> More
Naming lossless more appropriate

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Starting just discussing the naming first ignoring tech details, lossless is a negative and double negative word for one good reason should get named more appropriate: Lossless also matches nothing. When naming like all intact or likewise matches something in a manner more physical like sounds are… >>> More
Lossless DVD to avi?

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
I'm looking for a free or GPL program to rip DVDs to avi. I have AutoGK, but that only makes a compressed DVD. I want full quality, filesize be damned! >>> More
How do I achieve lossless JPEG joining without truncation of partial MCUs?

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
I am working on a project for which I need to join thousands of JPEG images losslessly (I'm not talking about the Lossless JPEG/JPEG 2000/JPEG-LS formats here). Aforementioned images have varying levels of chroma subsampling (1x1, 1x2, 2x1, 2x2), resulting in varying MCU sizes (8x8, 8x16, 16x8, 16x16… >>> More
Trouble installing Lagarith Lossless Codec (Codec Removal?)

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
I had been using the Lagarith Lossless Codec with camstudio on Windows XP Pro SP3 for a little while before I switched to Ubuntu. Now I'm back trying to do something on windows and the codec is now missing. I tried to install it via the .exe and even manually with the .inf but it's not being listed… >>> More

Related posts about lossless-compression

Hardware Lossless Compression for Hard Drives?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I happened across this article about hardware based hard drive encryption and realized that not only would this give a great way to protect your data but it would also speed up the applications that we use to encrypt that data. This lead me to wonder... Would it be possible to do the same thing… >>> More
Improving lossless codecs [closed]

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Improve the name to match positively Starting just discussing the naming first ignoring tech details, lossless is a negative and double negative word for one good reason should get named more appropriate: Lossless also matches nothing. When naming like all intact or likewise matches something in a… >>> More
Naming lossless more appropriate

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Starting just discussing the naming first ignoring tech details, lossless is a negative and double negative word for one good reason should get named more appropriate: Lossless also matches nothing. When naming like all intact or likewise matches something in a manner more physical like sounds are… >>> More
What is best compression scheme for very small data as1.66kBytes

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
this data is stored in an array (using C++) and is repitition of 125 bits each one varying from other also has 8 messages of 12 ASCII characters each at end..... Please suggest that should i use diffential compression within array and how? or i should apply some other compression scheme as whole… >>> More
array data compression that is holding 13268 bits(1.66kBytes)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
i.e array is having 100*125 bits of data for each aircraft+8 ascii messages each of 12 characters what compression technique should i apply to such data >>> More