Best support now on windows: Mercurial or Git?

Posted by mamcx on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by mamcx
Published on 2010-03-31T02:34:15Z Indexed on 2010/03/31 2:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 331

Filed under:
|
|

I want to change my current subversion setup to Mercurial or Git.

I read about the two and I have a conflicted view about how well they work on windows.

Alot of pages say Git is sub-par on windows, slow and badly integrated. And almost everyone say Mercurial is better. But some say Git now is better and Mercurial is behind.

I check the screenshots of TortoiseHG and TortoiseGIT and the mercurial one look "worse"... but maybe is just crappy screenshots?

I read about the two, prefer the command-line interface of Mercurial, but seriously, I don't pretend to touch the command line. And if one of the two is a real improvenment to SVN, I don't have to do that (In SVN is necesary go to the metal because something need fix).

In SVN I have issues when commit or get code made on OSX (I code on Windows, OSX, Solaris. Mainly windows). So I hope don't get that issues again (I mean, failure to commit to the repo).

I have a small repository, doing solo.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about mercurial

Related posts about git