Best support now on windows: Mercurial or Git?
Posted
by mamcx
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by mamcx
Published on 2010-03-31T02:34:15Z
Indexed on
2010/03/31
2:53 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 331
I want to change my current subversion setup to Mercurial or Git.
I read about the two and I have a conflicted view about how well they work on windows.
Alot of pages say Git is sub-par on windows, slow and badly integrated. And almost everyone say Mercurial is better. But some say Git now is better and Mercurial is behind.
I check the screenshots of TortoiseHG and TortoiseGIT and the mercurial one look "worse"... but maybe is just crappy screenshots?
I read about the two, prefer the command-line interface of Mercurial, but seriously, I don't pretend to touch the command line. And if one of the two is a real improvenment to SVN, I don't have to do that (In SVN is necesary go to the metal because something need fix).
In SVN I have issues when commit or get code made on OSX (I code on Windows, OSX, Solaris. Mainly windows). So I hope don't get that issues again (I mean, failure to commit to the repo).
I have a small repository, doing solo.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner