BizTalk 2009 - Naming Guidelines
Posted
by StuartBrierley
on Geeks with Blogs
See other posts from Geeks with Blogs
or by StuartBrierley
Published on Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:41:24 GMT
Indexed on
2010/03/31
13:53 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 667
The following is effectively a repost of the BizTalk 2004 naming guidlines that I have previously detailed. I have posted these again for completeness under BizTalk 2009 and to allow an element of separation in case I find some reason to amend these for BizTalk 2009.
These guidlines should be universal across any version of BizTalk you may wish to apply them to.
General Rules
All names should be named with a Pascal convention.
Project Namespaces
For message schemas:
[CompanyName].XML.Schemas.[FunctionalName]*
Examples:
ABC.XML.Schemas.Underwriting
DEF.XML.Schemas.MarshmellowTradingExchange
* Donates potential for multiple levels of functional name, such as Underwriting.Dictionary.Valuation
For web services:
[CompanyName].Web.Services.[FunctionalName]
Examples:
ABC.Web.Services.OrderJellyBeans
For the main BizTalk Projects:
[CompanyName].BizTalk.[AssemblyType].[FunctionalName]*
Examples:
ABC.BizTalk.Mappings.Underwriting
ABC.BizTalk.Orchestrations.Underwriting
* Donates potential for multiple levels of functional name, such as Mappings.Underwriting.Valuations
Assemblies
BizTalk Assembly names should match the associated Project Namespace, such as ABC.BizTalk.Mappings.Underwriting.
This pertains to the formal assembly name and the DLL name.
The Solution name should take the name of the main project within the solution, and also therefore the namespace for that project.
Although long names such as this can be unwieldy to work with, the benefits of having the full scope available when the assemblies are installed on the target server are generally judged to outweigh this inconvenience.
Messaging Artifacts
Artifact |
Standard |
Notes |
Example |
|
Schema |
<DescriptiveName>.xsd |
|
.NET Type name should match, without file extension.
.NET Namespace will likely match assembly name. |
PurchaseOrderAcknowledge_FF.xsd or FNMA100330_FF.xsd |
Property Schema |
<DescriptiveName>.xsd |
Should be named to reflect possible common usage across multiple schemas |
IspecMessagePropertySchema.xsd UnderwritingOrchestrationKeys.xsd |
|
Map |
<SourceSchema>2<DestinationSchema>.btm |
Exceptions to this may be made where the source and destination schemas share the majority of the name, such as in mainframe web service maps |
InstructionResponse2CustomEmailRequest.btm (exception example) AccountCustomerAddressSummaryRequest2MainframeRequest.btm |
|
Orchestration |
<DescriptiveName>.odx |
|
GetValuationReports.odx SendMTEDecisionResponse.odx |
|
Send/Receive Pipeline |
<DescriptiveName>.btp |
|
ValidatingXMLReceivePipeline.btp FlatFileAssembler.btp |
|
Receive Port |
A plainly worded phrase that will clearly explain the function. |
|
FraudPreventionServices LetterProcessing |
|
Receive Location |
A plainly worded phrase that will clearly explain the function. |
? Do we want to include the transport type here ? |
Arrears Web Service |
|
Send Port Group |
A plainly worded phrase that will clearly explain the function. |
|
Customer Updates |
|
Send Port |
A plainly worded phrase that will clearly explain the function. |
|
ABCProductUpdater LogLendingPolicyOutput |
|
Parties |
A meaningful name for a Trading Partner. |
If dealing with multiple entities within a Trading Partner organization, the Organization name could be used as a prefix. |
|
|
Roles |
A meaningful name for the role that a Trading Partner plays. |
|
|
Orchestration Workflow Shapes
Shape |
Standard |
Notes |
Example |
Scopes |
<DescriptionOfContainedWork> or <DescOfcontainedWork><TxType>
|
Including info about transaction type may be appropriate in some situations where it adds significant documentation value to the diagram. |
HandleReportResponse |
|
|
|
|
Receive |
Receive<MessageName> |
Typically, MessageName will be the same as the name of the message variable that is being received “into”. |
ReceiveReportResponse |
Send |
Send<MessageName> |
Typically, MessageName will be the same as the name of the message variable that is being sent. |
SendValuationDetailsRequest |
Expression |
<DescriptionOfEffect> |
Expression shapes should be named to describe the net effect of the expression, similar to naming a method. The exception to this is the case where the expression is interacting with an external .NET component to perform a function that overlaps with existing BizTalk functionality – use closest BizTalk shape for this case. |
CreatePrintXML |
Decide |
<DescriptionOfDecision> |
A description of what will be decided in the “if” branch |
Report Type? Perform MF Save? |
If-Branch |
<DescriptionOfDecision> |
A (potentially abbreviated) description of what is being decided |
Mortgage Valuation Yes |
Else-Branch |
Else |
Else-branch shapes should always be named “Else” |
Else |
Construct Message (Assign) |
Create<Message> (for Construct)
<ExpressionDescription> (for expression) |
If a Construct shape contains a message assignment, it should be prefixed with “Create” followed by an abbreviated name of the message being assigned.
The actual message assignment shape contained should be named to describe the expression that is contained. |
CreateReportDataMV
which contains expression: ExtractReportData |
Construct Message (Transform) |
Create<Message> (for Construct)
<SourceSchema>2<DestSchema> (for transform) |
If a Construct shape contains a message transform, it should be prefixed with “Create” followed by an abbreviated name of the message being assigned.
The actual message transform shape contained should generally be named the same as the called map. |
CreateReportDataMV
which contains transform: ReportDataMV2ReportDataMV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construct Message (containing multiple shapes) |
|
If a Construct Message shape uses multiple assignments or transforms, the overall shape should be named to communicate the net effect, using no prefix.
|
|
Call/Start Orchestration |
Call<OrchestrationName>
Start<OrchestrationName> |
|
|
Throw |
Throw<ExceptionType> |
The corresponding variable name for the exception type should (often) be the same name as the exception type, only camel-cased. |
ThrowRuleException, which references the “ruleException” variable.
|
Parallel |
<DescriptionOfParallelWork> |
Parallel shapes should be named by a description of what work will be done in parallel |
|
Delay |
<DescriptionOfWhatWaitingFor> |
Delay shapes should be named by a description of what is being waited for. |
POAcknowledgeTimeout |
Listen |
<DescriptionOfOutcomes> |
Listen shapes should be named by a description that captures (to the degree possible) all the branches of the Listen shape |
POAckOrTimeout FirstShippingBid |
Loop |
<DescriptionOfLoop> |
A (potentially abbreviated) description of what the loop is. |
ForEachValuationReport WhileErrorFlagTrue |
Role Link |
|
See “Roles” in messaging naming conventions above. |
|
Suspend |
<ReasonDescription> |
Describe what action an administrator must take to resume the orchestration. More detail can be passed to error property – and should include what should be done by the administrator before resuming the orchestration. |
ReEstablishCreditLink |
Terminate |
<ReasonDescription> |
Describe why the orchestration terminated. More detail can be passed to error property. |
TimeoutsExpired |
Call Rules |
Call<PolicyName> |
The policy name may need to be abbreviated. |
CallLendingPolicy |
Compensate |
Compensate or Compensate<TxName> |
If the shape compensates nested transactions, names should be suffixed with the name of the nested transaction – otherwise it should simple be Compensate. |
CompensateTransferFunds |
Orchestration Types
Type |
Standard |
Notes |
Example |
Multi-Part Message Types |
<LogicalDocumentType>
|
Multi-part types encapsulate multiple parts. The WSDL spec indicates “parts are a flexible mechanism for describing the logical abstract content of a message.” The name of the multi-part type should correspond to the “logical” document type, i.e. what the sum of the parts describes. |
InvoiceReceipt
(which might encapsulate an invoice acknowledgement and a payment voucher.) |
Multi-Part Messsage Part |
<SchemaNameOfPart> |
Should be named (most often) simply for the schema (or simple type) associated with the part. |
InvoiceHeader |
Messages |
<SchemaName> or <MuliPartMessageTypeName> |
Should be named based on the corresponding schema type or multi-part message type. If there is more than one variable of a type, name for its use within the orchestration. |
ReportDataMV UpdatedReportDataMV |
Variables |
<DescriptiveName> |
|
TargetFilePath StringProcessor |
Port Types |
<FunctionDescription>PortType |
Should be named to suggest the nature of an endpoint, with pascal casing and suffixed with “PortType”. If there will be more than one Port for a Port Type, the Port Type should be named according to the abstract service supplied.
The WSDL spec indicates port types are “a named set of abstract operations and the abstract messages involved” that also encapsulates the message pattern (i.e. one-way, request-response, solicit-response) that all operations on the port type adhere to. |
ReceiveReportResponsePortType or CallEAEPortType (This is a two way port, so Receove or Send alone would not be appropriate. Could have been ProcessEAERequestPortType etc....) |
Ports |
<FunctionDescription>Port |
Should be named to suggest a grouping of functionality, with pascal casing and suffixed with “Port.” |
ReceiveReportResponsePort CallEAEPort |
Correlation types |
<DescriptiveName> |
Should be named based on the logical name of what is being used to correlate. |
PurchaseOrderNumber |
Correlation sets |
<DescriptiveName> |
Should be named based on the corresponding correlation type. If there is more than one, it should be named to reflect its specific purpose within the orchestration.
|
PurchaseOrderNumber |
Orchestration parameters |
<DescriptiveName> |
Should be named to match the caller’s names for the corresponding variables where appropriate. |
|
© Geeks with Blogs or respective owner