GlusterFS vs Ceph, which is better for production use for the moment?

Posted by Mickey Shine on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Mickey Shine
Published on 2010-03-31T02:52:19Z Indexed on 2010/03/31 3:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 672

I am evaluating GlusterFS and Ceph, seems Gluster is FUSE based which means it may be not as fast as Ceph. But looks like Gluster got a very friendly control panel and is ease to use.

Ceph was merged into linux kernel a few days ago and this indicates that it has much more potential energy and may be a good choice in the future.

I am wondering which(even out of the two?) is a better choice for production use? It would be nice if you could share your practical experiences

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about distributed-filesystems

Related posts about load-balancing