ASP ListView - Eval() as formatted number, Bind() as unformatted?
Posted
by chucknelson
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by chucknelson
Published on 2010-03-24T18:45:23Z
Indexed on
2010/04/02
12:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 205
I have an ASP ListView, and have a very simple requirement to display numbers as formatted w/ a comma (12,123), while they need to bind to the database without formatting (12123). I am using a standard setup - ListView with a datasource attached, using Bind().
I converted from some older code, so I'm not using ASP.NET controls, just form inputs...but I don't think it matters for this:
<asp:SqlDataSource ID="MySqlDataSource" runat="server"
ConnectionString='<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString1 %>'
SelectCommand="SELECT NUMSTR FROM MY_TABLE WHERE ID = @ID"
UpdateCommand= "UPDATE MY_TABLE SET NUMSTR = @NUMSTR WHERE ID = @ID">
</asp:SqlDataSource>
<asp:ListView ID="MyListView" runat="server" DataSourceID="MySqlDataSource">
<LayoutTemplate>
<div id="itemplaceholder" runat="server"></div>
</LayoutTemplate>
<ItemTemplate>
<input type="text" name="NUMSTR" ID="NUMSTR"
runat="server" value='<%#Bind("NUMSTR")%>' />
<asp:Button ID="UpdateButton" runat="server" Text="Update" Commandname="Update" />
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:ListView>
In the example above, NUMSTR is a number, but stored as a string in a SqlServer 2008 database. I'm also using the ItemTemplate
as read and edit templates, to save on duplicate HTML. In the example, I only get the unformatted number. If I convert the field to an integer (via the SELECT
) and use a format string like Bind("NUMSTR", "{0:###,###}")
, it writes the formatted number to the database, and then fails when it tries to read it again (can't convert with the comma in there).
Is there any elegant/simple solution to this? It's so easy to get the two-way binding going, and I would think there has to be a way to easily format things as well...
Oh, and I'm trying to avoid the standard ItemTemplate
and EditItemTemplate
approach, just for sheer amount of markup required for that.
Thanks!
© Stack Overflow or respective owner