Is this a valid LGPL scenario?

Posted by themapguyde on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by themapguyde
Published on 2009-07-01T08:09:28Z Indexed on 2010/04/03 8:43 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 486

Filed under:
|

Suppose I have Project X under closed source. It references/links to component Y which is LGPL, we make modifications to component Y

1) We release Project X binaries with the source to the modified component Y

OR

2) We contribute component Y modifications back upstream (to the original author(s)) and release Project X binaries without component Y source.

Does any of these scenarios comply with the LGPL?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about lgpl

  • Dual-licensing LGPL 2.1 and LGPL 3

    as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
    I maintain a software, a small PHP library, that is released under the LGPL version 3 license (LGPLv3). Someone wants to use the library in their software which has the GPL version 2 license. This license compatibility matrix suggests this is not possible without changing the licensing terms of one… >>> More

  • LGPL and Dual Licensing Ajax Library

    as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
    Hi guys, I'm the previous founder of Gaiaware and Gaia Ajax Widgets and when I used to work there we had this rhetoric (which I have confirmed with some very smart FOSS people is correct) that when using a GPL Ajax library you're basically "distributing" the JavaScript which in turn makes the GPL… >>> More

  • LGPL to MIT License

    as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
    Hi, I was wondering if it is possible to release code I am working on which uses third party code licensed under the LGPL, under for instance the MIT License? Basically I dont want to change the license of the LGPL part, I am just wondering what happens with it if I chose a different license for… >>> More

  • Does the LGPL allow me to do this?

    as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
    I am planning to develop a commercial software using a LGPL software. In the LGPL software that I am using some functions in a class are not fully implemented. I want to modify the LGPL code so that the class and not-implemented functions are made visible outside the dll by adding dllexport infront… >>> More

  • How to mark that a lgpl library is modified

    as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
    I am using an LGPL library in my code. For my needs, I need to modify the code in the library. How do I mark the jar file that it contains modified code? Some txt file in the jar? In that case, what do I write in the txt file? I will include in the license agreement that we are distributing a modified… >>> More

Related posts about licensing