Some thoughts on the Virtualization Feedback in the SSWUG Newsletters

Posted by Jonathan Kehayias on SQL Blog See other posts from SQL Blog or by Jonathan Kehayias
Published on Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:49:49 GMT Indexed on 2010/04/03 14:04 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 574

Last Thursday, March 25, 2010, the topic of Virtualization of SQL Server came up in the SSWUG Newsletter , with Steven Wynkoop asking if peoples perceptions and experiences have changed since the last time he covered virtualizing SQL Server.  I unfortunately missed the last coverage of this topic, but it appears from the newsletter that there was a general consensus that “low-traffic solution could be fine, but if you had a heavy hitting application, the net advise was to avoid a virtual environment...(read more)

© SQL Blog or respective owner

Some thoughts on the Virtualization Feedback in the SSWUG Newsletters

Posted by Jonathan Kehayias on SQL Blog See other posts from SQL Blog or by Jonathan Kehayias
Published on Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:49:49 GMT Indexed on 2010/04/03 23:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 572

Last Thursday, March 25, 2010, the topic of Virtualization of SQL Server came up in the SSWUG Newsletter , with Steven Wynkoop asking if peoples perceptions and experiences have changed since the last time he covered virtualizing SQL Server.  I unfortunately missed the last coverage of this topic, but it appears from the newsletter that there was a general consensus that “low-traffic solution could be fine, but if you had a heavy hitting application, the net advise was to avoid a virtual environment...(read more)

© SQL Blog or respective owner

Related posts about Articles

Related posts about Database Administration