The speed of .NET in numerical computing

Posted by Yin Zhu on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Yin Zhu
Published on 2009-12-02T08:09:30Z Indexed on 2010/04/03 23:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 389

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

In my experience, .net is 2 to 3 times slower than native code. (I implemented L-BFGS for multivariate optimization).

I have traced the ads on stackoverflow to http://www.centerspace.net/products/

the speed is really amazing, the speed is close to native code. How can they do that? They said that:

Q. Is NMath "pure" .NET?

A. The answer depends somewhat on your definition of "pure .NET". NMath is written in C#, plus a small Managed C++ layer. For better performance of basic linear algebra operations, however, NMath does rely on the native Intel Math Kernel Library (included with NMath). But there are no COM components, no DLLs--just .NET assemblies. Also, all memory allocated in the Managed C++ layer and used by native code is allocated from the managed heap.

Can someone explain more to me?

Thanks!

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about .NET

Related posts about numerical