SSIS - Parallel Execution of Tasks - How efficient is it?

Posted by Randy Minder on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Randy Minder
Published on 2010-03-02T13:05:52Z Indexed on 2010/04/05 18:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 312

Filed under:

I am building an SSIS package that will contain dozens of Sequence tasks. Each Sequence task will contain three tasks. One to truncate a destination table and remove indexes on the table, another to import data from a source table, and a third to add back indexes to the destination table.

My question is this. I currently have nine of these Sequences tasks built, and none are dependent on any of the others. When I execute the package, SSIS seems to do a pretty good job of determining which tasks in which Sequence to execute, which, by the way, appears to be quite random. As I continue adding more Sequences, should I attempt to be smarter about how SSIS should execute these Sequences, or is SSIS smart enough to do it itself?

Thanks.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about ssis