SSIS - Parallel Execution of Tasks - How efficient is it?
Posted
by Randy Minder
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Randy Minder
Published on 2010-03-02T13:05:52Z
Indexed on
2010/04/05
18:03 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 312
ssis
I am building an SSIS package that will contain dozens of Sequence tasks. Each Sequence task will contain three tasks. One to truncate a destination table and remove indexes on the table, another to import data from a source table, and a third to add back indexes to the destination table.
My question is this. I currently have nine of these Sequences tasks built, and none are dependent on any of the others. When I execute the package, SSIS seems to do a pretty good job of determining which tasks in which Sequence to execute, which, by the way, appears to be quite random. As I continue adding more Sequences, should I attempt to be smarter about how SSIS should execute these Sequences, or is SSIS smart enough to do it itself?
Thanks.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner