Why pass by const reference instead of by value?

Posted by Maulrus on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Maulrus
Published on 2010-04-06T05:22:24Z Indexed on 2010/04/06 5:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 228

Filed under:
|

From what I understand: when you pass by value, the function makes a local copy of the passed argument and uses that; when the function ends, it goes out of scope. When you pass by const reference, the function uses a reference to the passed argument that can't be modified. I don't understand, however, why one would choose one over the other, except in a situation where an argument needs to be modified and returned. If you had a void function where nothing is getting returned, why choose one over the other?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c++

Related posts about functions