C String literals: Where do they go?

Posted by Chris Cooper on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Chris Cooper
Published on 2010-04-07T04:11:10Z Indexed on 2010/04/07 4:13 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 371

Filed under:

c

|

string-literals

|

memory

|

heap

|

stack

I have read a lot of posts about "string literals" on SO, most of which have been about best-practices, or where the literal is NOT located in memory.

I am interested in where the string DOES get allocated/stored, etc.

I did find one intriguing answer here, saying:

Defining a string inline actually embeds the data in the program itself and cannot be changed (some compilers allow this by a smart trick, don't bother).

but, it had to do with C++, not to mention that it says not to bother.

I am bothering. =D

So my question is, again, where and how is my string literal kept? Why should I not try to alter it? Does the implementation vary by platform? Does anyone care to elaborate on the "smart trick?"

Thanks for any explanations.

Related posts about string-literals

String literals vs constants for Session[...] dictionary keys

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Session[Constant] vs Session["String Literal"] Performance I'm retrieving user-specific data like ViewData["CartItems"] = Session["CartItems"]; with a string literal for keys on every request. Should I be using constants for this? If yes, how should I go about implementing frequently used string… >>> More
C String literals: Where do they go?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have read a lot of posts about "string literals" on SO, most of which have been about best-practices, or where the literal is NOT located in memory. I am interested in where the string DOES get allocated/stored, etc. I did find one intriguing answer here, saying: Defining a string inline actually… >>> More
Why allow concatenation of string literals?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I recently got bit by a subtle bug. char ** int2str = { "zero", // 0 "one", // 1 "two" // 2 "three",// 3 nullptr }; assert( values[1] == "one"_s ); // passes assert( values[2] == "two"_s ); // fails If you have godlike code review powers you'll notice I forgot the , after "two"… >>> More
Warning: comparison with string literals results in unspecified behaviour

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
So I starting the project of writing a simplified sheel for linux in c. I am not at all proficient with c nor with Linux that's exactly the reason I decided it would be a good idea. Starting with the parser, I have already encountered some problems. The code should be straightforward that's why… >>> More
String literals C++?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I need to do the following C# code in C++ (if possible). I have to const a long string with lots of freaking quotes and other stuff in it. const String _literal = @"I can use "quotes" inside here"; >>> More

Developer IT