Is defragging tough on replication?

Posted by Jim on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Jim
Published on 2010-04-07T15:45:57Z Indexed on 2010/04/07 15:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 307

Filed under:

sql-server-2005

|

replication

|

defragmentation

I've been told that defragging causes the log to grow tremendously. Is this true? If so, is there something better to do than defragging that will not impact the log as much? We are running SQL Server 2005 replicating between 2 sites.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about sql-server-2005

[MAJ] SQL Server 2005 Express Edition - La version gratuite de SQL Server 2005

as seen on ASP-PHP.net - Search for 'ASP-PHP.net'
Modification technique pour le site de l'article. >>> More
SQLAuthority News – Feature Pack for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 SP4

as seen on SQL Authority - Search for 'SQL Authority'
If you are still using SQL Server 2005 – I suggest that you consider migrating to later version of the SQL Server 2008/2008 R2. Due to any reason, you wanted to continue using SQL Server 2005, I suggest that you take a look at the Feature Pack for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 SP4. There are many… >>> More
SQL Server 2005 - Syncing development/production databases

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I've got a rather large SQL Server 2005 database that is under constant development. Every so often, I either get a new developer or need to deploy wide-scale schema changes to the production server. My main concern is deploying schema + data updates to developer machines from the "master" development… >>> More
Displaying the Row Number in a SELECT Query with SQL Server 2005

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
SQL Server 2005 introduced a function that is very handy when you want the result set to have row numbers assigned to each returned row. >>> More
Displaying the Row Number in a SELECT Query with SQL Server 2005

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
SQL Server 2005 introduced a function that is very handy when you want the result set to have row numbers assigned to each returned row. >>> More

Related posts about replication

Is there any replication standard or concept for application server data replication

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi friends, Say, I have a server that handles file based mass data and can process thousands of read requests and hundreds of provisioning requests(Add, modify, delete) per second. This is not SQL based database. Now i planned to implement replication. There should be master- master replication,… >>> More
MySQL Connect 8 Days Away - Replication Sessions

as seen on Oracle Blogs - Search for 'Oracle Blogs'
Following on from my post about MySQL Cluster sessions at the forthcoming Connect conference, its now the turn of MySQL Replication - another technology at the heart of scaling and high availability for MySQL. Unless you've only just returned from a 6-month alien abduction, you will know… >>> More
re-enabling a table for mysql replication

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
We were able to setup mysql master-slave replication with the following version on both master/slave: mysqld Ver 5.5.28-29.1-log for Linux on x86_64 (Percona Server (GPL), Release 29.1) One day, we noticed that replication has stopped, we tried skipping over the entries that caused the replication… >>> More
Replication Services in a BI environment

as seen on SQL Blog - Search for 'SQL Blog'
In this blog post I will explain the principles of SQL Server Replication Services without too much detail and I will take a look on the BI capabilities that Replication Services could offer in my opinion. SQL Server Replication Services provides tools to copy and distribute database objects from… >>> More
Fixing MySQL Replication

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
Continuing last months article on "MySQL Replication Pitfalls," Sean Hull discusses what to do to make your replication setup more resilient. >>> More