How to use List<T>.Find() on a simple collection that does not implement Find()?

Posted by Bilal on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Bilal
Published on 2010-04-07T13:53:20Z Indexed on 2010/04/08 8:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 292

Filed under:

c#3.0

|

generics

Hi, I want to use List.Find() on a simple collection that does not implement Find(). The naive way I thought of, is to just wrap it with a list and execute .Find(), like this:

ICollection myCows = GetAllCowsFromFarm(); // whatever the collection impl. is...
var steak = new List<Cow>(myCows).Find(moo => moo.Name == "La Vache qui Rit");

Now, 1st of all I'd like to know, C#-wise, what is the cost of this wrapping? Is it still faster to 'for' this collection the traditional way?

Second, is there a better straightforward way elegantly use that .Find()?

Cheers!

Related posts about generics

Java generics: What is the compiler's issue here?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have the following methods: public <T> T fromJson( Reader jsonData, Class<T> clazz ) { return fromJson( jsonData, (Type)clazz ); } public <T> T fromJson( Reader jsonData, Type clazz ) { ... } The compiler is saying about the first method: type parameters of <T>T… >>> More
Why does NUnit ignore datapoints when using generics in a theory

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm trying to make use of the TheoryAttribute, introduced in NUnit 2.5. Everything works fine as long as the arguments are of a defined type: [Datapoint] public double[,] Array2X2 = new double[,] { { 1, 0 }, { 0, 1 } }; [Theory] public void TestForArbitraryArray(double[,] array) { // ... } It… >>> More
Instantiating generics type in java

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I would like to create an object of Generics Type in java. Please suggest how can I achieve the same. suppose I have the class declaration as: public class Abc<T> { public static void main(String[] args) { // I want to create an instance of T } } >>> More
.NET converting simple arrays to List Generics

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
This question might seem trivial and also stupid at the first glance, but it is much more than this. I have an array of any type T (T[]) and I want to convert it into a List generic (List<T>). Is there any other way apart from creating a Generic list, traversing the whole array and adding the… >>> More
Instantiating a list of parameterized types, making beter use of Generics and Linq

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm hashing a file with one or more hash algorithms. When I tried to parametrize which hash types I want, it got a lot messier than I was hoping. I think I'm missing a chance to make better use of generics or LINQ. I also don't like that I have to use a Type[] as the parameter instead of limiting… >>> More

Developer IT

How to use List<T>.Find() on a simple collection that does not implement Find()? - Developer IT

How to use List<T>.Find() on a simple collection that does not implement Find()?

c#3.0

generics

Related posts about c#3.0

Linq Tutorial

Related posts about generics

Java generics: What is the compiler's issue here?

Why does NUnit ignore datapoints when using generics in a theory

Instantiating generics type in java

.NET converting simple arrays to List Generics

Instantiating a list of parameterized types, making beter use of Generics and Linq

Categories cloud