Why Automatically implemented properties must define both get and set accessors.

Posted by Nasser Hajloo on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Nasser Hajloo
Published on 2010-04-08T06:06:25Z Indexed on 2010/04/08 6:13 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 394

Filed under:

property

|

accessors

When we define a property like

    public string Name {get; set;}

dot net can make our properties code. but when we use

    public string Name {get;}
    public string Name {set;}

we face with

'Hajloo.SomeThing.PropertyName.set' must declare a body because it is not marked abstract or extern. Automatically implemented properties must define both get and set accessors.

Actualy whay compiler can't determine the property and make code automatically ? what's happen ?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about property

Python Glade could not create GladeXML Object

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hey, I've created a simple window GUI in Glade 3.6.7 and I am trying to import it into Python. Every time I try to do so I get the following error: (queryrelevanceevaluation.py:8804): libglade-WARNING **: Expected <glade-interface>. Got <interface>. (queryrelevanceevaluation.py:8804):… >>> More
Segmentation fault when running a python script/GTKBuilder app?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm trying to learn GUI programming using python2 and GTKBuilder, but I get a segmentation fault when I run the code. This is my file, created in Glade as a GTKBuilder file: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <interface>  <object class="GtkWindow"… >>> More
Assigning property to JS object using another objects property value as the property name

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hey guys, I want to use the value of an objects property to name the property of another object. Easy to do in PHP: $object1->property = 'name'; $object2->{$object1->property} = "value"; echo $object2->name; //outputs "value" But in Javascript I can't figure out how to do this. The… >>> More
Demystifying Silverlight Dependency Properties

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
I have the opportunity to teach a lot of people about Silverlight (amongst other technologies) and one of the topics that definitely confuses people initially is the concept of dependency properties. I confess that when I first heard about them my initial thought was “Why do we need a specialized… >>> More
Sharepoint Error: [COMException (0x80004005): Cannot complete this action.

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I've created a site basic definition that uses different master and default pages. Everything works quite well except for whenever I create a new site based on the definition I receive the following error when browsing to the new site: [COMException (0x80004005): Cannot complete this action… >>> More

Related posts about accessors

Empty accessors do matter?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I have following code that does not work due to "a" being a value typed. But I thought it would not work even without accessors, but it did: class Program { a _a { get; //when both accessors deleted, it will work set; } static void… >>> More
Targets, Accessors, and Trees

as seen on Oracle Technology Network - Search for 'Oracle Technology Network'
Hierarchical data displays with Oracle ADF >>> More
Frameworks: Targets, Accessors, and Trees

as seen on Oracle Technology Network - Search for 'Oracle Technology Network'
Hierarchical data displays are simple with Oracle Application Development Framework. >>> More
Allow single-line accessor (getter/setter) syntax with Checkstyle

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
We'd like to have trivial Java property accessors using a single line syntax, so they take up much much less space, and are more readable (in terms of 'seeing' the set of accessors quickly). But we do want to enforce multi-line method syntax for everything else in our checkstyle configuration. But… >>> More
Empty accessors do matter? Regarding value types and their modification

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I have following code that does not work due to "a" being a value typed. But I thought it would not work even without accessors, but it did: class Program { a _a //with accessors it WONT compile { get; set; } static void Main(string[]… >>> More