MPICH2 vs KERRYGHED

Posted by user40135 on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by user40135
Published on 2010-04-09T12:52:53Z Indexed on 2010/04/09 12:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 201

Filed under:

Hi All

right now I am moving first steps in clustering.

I installed MPICH2 on my Ubuntu at home and I have a silly question about it. For what I am reading right now it seems that it provides the capability of sending processes to other pcs. I went for this lib just because I set it up very quickly and easily.

Compared to MPICH2 , do you know what is the advantage of having a different clustering system like KERRYGHED? It seems that these ones also provide this capability, but the Kernel must be rebuild, so I suppose that it is going to be faster.

What other advantages are remarkable for a clustering system like this? Thanks

© Server Fault or respective owner

MPICH2 vs KERRYGHED

Posted by user311906 on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by user311906
Published on 2010-04-09T07:00:18Z Indexed on 2010/04/09 7:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 201

Filed under:

Hi All

right now I am moving first steps in clustering.

I installed MPICH2 on my Ubuntu at home and I have a silly question about it. For what I am reading right now it seems that it provides the capability of sending processes to other pcs. I went for this lib just because I set it up very quickly and easily.

Compared to MPICH2 , do you know what is the advantage of having a different clustering system like KERRYGHED? It seems that these ones also provide this capability, but the Kernel must be rebuild, so I suppose that it is going to be faster.

What other advantages are remarkable for a clustering system like this? Thanks

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about clustering