Boost asio async vs blocking reads, udp speed/quality
Posted
by Dolphin
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Dolphin
Published on 2009-07-27T14:47:43Z
Indexed on
2010/04/10
9:03 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 601
I have a quick and dirty proof of concept app that I wrote in C# that reads high data rate multicast UDP packets from the network. For various reasons the full implementation will be written in C++ and I am considering using boost asio. The C# version used a thread to receive the data using blocking reads. I had some problems with dropped packets if the computer was heavily loaded (generally with processing those packets in another thread).
What I would like to know is if the async read operations in boost (which use overlapped io in windows) will help ensure that I receive the packets and/or reduce the cpu time needed to receive the packets. The single thread doing blocking reads is pretty straightforward, using the async reads seems like a step up in complexity, but I think it would be worth it if it provided higher performance or dropped fewer packets on a heavily loaded system. Currently the data rate should be no higher than 60Mb/s.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner