Is automated source translation seen as beneficial and/or necessary?

Posted by busybutwantmore on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by busybutwantmore
Published on 2009-06-17T19:14:13Z Indexed on 2010/04/12 23:52 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 265

Filed under:
|

I have recently spent several years translating legacy FORTRAN into Java. Prior to that, I found myself translating FORTRAN into C (for which I wrote a simple translation tool). After all this work, I find myself wondering how many others are doing similar language-to-language translations and whether an automated way of doing so would be beneficial.

I know about F2C, For_C, F2J and others, as well as some of the translation sites, but none seem to be all that successful. Having seen output from For_C, I can see why it just hasn't taken off. While it is technically correct, it is very difficult to maintain.

So, I guess what I am wondering is if there were are tool that produced more maintainable, more grok-able code than the code I have seen, would developers use it? Or are developers as jaded as many posts seem to indicate and unwilling to use generated code as it could never be as good as their manually translated code?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about conversion

Related posts about translation