Singleton class design in C#, are these two classes equivalent?
Posted
by Oskar
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Oskar
Published on 2010-04-12T07:28:50Z
Indexed on
2010/04/12
7:33 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 379
I was reading up on singleton class design in C# on this great resource and decided to go with alternative 4:
public sealed class Singleton1
{
static readonly Singleton1 _instance = new Singleton1();
static Singleton1()
{
}
Singleton1()
{
}
public static Singleton1 Instance
{
get
{
return _instance;
}
}
}
Now I wonder if this can be rewritten using auto properties like this?
public sealed class Singleton2
{
static Singleton2()
{
Instance = new Singleton2();
}
Singleton2()
{
}
public static Singleton2 Instance { get; private set; }
}
If its only a matter of readability I definitely prefer the second version, but I want to get it right.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner