Which programming languages aren't considered high-level?
Posted
by hilo
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by hilo
Published on 2010-04-12T19:27:20Z
Indexed on
2010/04/12
19:32 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 562
In informatics theory I hear and read about high-level and low-level languages all time.
Yet I don't understand why this is still relevant as there aren't any (relevant) low-level languages except assembler in use today.
So you get:
Low-level
- Assembler
Definitely not low-level
- C
- BASIC
- FORTRAN
- COBOL
- ...
High-level
- C++
- Ruby
- Python
- PHP
- ...
And if assembler is low-level, how could you put for example C into the same list. I mean: C is extremely high-level compared to assembler. Same even for COBOL, Fortran, etc.
- So why does everybody keep mentioning high and low-level languages if assembler is really the only low-level language.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner