Arguments to convince to switch from CVS to SVN
Posted
by ereOn
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by ereOn
Published on 2010-04-13T09:09:36Z
Indexed on
2010/04/13
9:13 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 220
Hi,
The UNIX department of my company currently uses CVS as source-version control system. They use it in a very strange way: different repositories for development/testing/production code (for the same project), no one tags anything, weird directory architecture, and so on.
The system has been set for ages but now, I have an opportunity to organize a meeting where I have to suggest changes. I'd like to make them change from CVS to SVN (Mercurial or Git might be even better, however I can't really recommand using a system I don't know well, and switching to SVN will already be a great step forward).
I don't have much experience with CVS so I can't compare them efficiently: I just know it doesn't support atomic operations and that it is deprecated.
What killer arguments would you use to convince my collegues to do the switch ?
Thank you very much.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner