Why might SQL execute more quickly on SQL Server 2000 when NOT using a stored procedure?
Posted
by Kofi Sarfo
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Kofi Sarfo
Published on 2010-04-14T22:40:47Z
Indexed on
2010/04/14
22:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 342
I could see nothing wrong with the execution plan. Besides, as I understand it, SQL Server 2000 extended many of the performance benefits of stored procedures to all SQL statements by recognising new T-SQL statements against T-SQL statements of existing execution plans (by retaining execution plans for all SQL statements in the procedure cache, not just stored procedure execution plans)
It's a fairly straight forward SELECT statement with sensible table joins, no transactions included or linked servers being referenced within the query and WITH (NOLOCK) table hints applied. The stored procedure was created by dbo and the user has all the necessary permissions.
So my question is this:
What are the likely reasons for a query to take only a few seconds to run but then take several minutes when identical T-SQL is run via a stored procedure?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner