Why the "mutable default argument fix" syntax is so ugly, asks python newbie

Posted by Cawas on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Cawas
Published on 2010-04-14T18:17:35Z Indexed on 2010/04/14 22:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 296

Filed under:
|
|
|

Now following my series of "python newbie questions" and based on another question.

Go to http://python.net/~goodger/projects/pycon/2007/idiomatic/handout.html#other-languages-have-variables and scroll down to "Default Parameter Values". There you can find the following:

def bad_append(new_item, a_list=[]):
    a_list.append(new_item)
    return a_list

def good_append(new_item, a_list=None):
    if a_list is None:
        a_list = []
    a_list.append(new_item)
    return a_list

So, question here is: why is the "good" syntax over a known issue ugly like that in a programming language that promotes "elegant syntax" and "easy-to-use"?

Why not just something in the definition itself, that the "argument" name is attached to a "localized" mutable object like:

def better_append(new_item, a_list=[].local):
    a_list.append(new_item)
    return a_list

I'm sure there would be a better way to do this syntax, but I'm also almost positive there's a good reason to why it hasn't been done. So, anyone happens to know why?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about python

Related posts about beginner