Has anyone found the need to declare the return parameter of a copy assignment operator const?
Posted
by Keith
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Keith
Published on 2010-04-15T21:20:43Z
Indexed on
2010/04/15
21:23 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 140
c++
|assignment-operator
The copy assignment operator has the usual signature:
my_class & operator = (my_class const & rhs);
Does the following signature have any practical use?
my_class const & operator = (my_class const & rhs);
You can only define one or the other, but not both.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner