problem with IN clause in SQL
Posted
by user179056
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by user179056
Published on 2010-04-15T14:00:09Z
Indexed on
2010/04/15
14:23 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 161
Hello, We have observed that there seems to be a maximum number of ids/variables which one can pass in the IN clause of SQL as comma seperated values. To avoid this we are storing all the ids in a table and doing a SELECT within the IN clause. This however means extra database operations to store and retrieve ids. Is there any other way to use IN without SELECT? regards Sameer
© Stack Overflow or respective owner