SQL Server, temporary tables with truncate vs table variable with delete
Posted
by Richard
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Richard
Published on 2010-04-15T15:32:50Z
Indexed on
2010/04/15
15:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 519
sqlserver2005
|temporary-tables
I have a stored procedure inside which I create a temporary table that typically contains between 1 and 10 rows. This table is truncated and filled many times during the stored procedure. It is truncated as this is faster than delete. Do I get any performance increase by replacing this temporary table with a table variable when I suffer a penalty for using delete (truncate does not work on table variables)
Whilst table variables are mainly in memory and are generally faster than temp tables do I loose any benefit by having to delete rather than truncate?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner