Alternative to robocopy /MIR
Posted
by Robin Day
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by Robin Day
Published on 2010-04-16T08:09:49Z
Indexed on
2010/04/16
8:13 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 893
We run a number of web apps that store a lot of local data in small xml files. One part of our backup / recovery strategy is to produce a local mirror of the file system via a VPN to the hosting centre.
The VPN connection is only via a 12Mbps ADSL and whilst there are a lot of files and directories, the actual number of files that changes is quite small.
Although the bandwidth is probably an issue, I'm seeing results such as the output below. The robocopy /MIR took 5 hours to run yet only 30 mins to actually perform the copy.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to ways to improve this. The 5 hours is now bordering on too slow and if we can't find a way to speed this up then we're going to have to come up with a completely different solution.
Total Copied Skipped Mismatch FAILED Extras
Dirs : 17625 6618 11007 0 0 0
Files : 1112430 1223 1111207 0 0 0
Bytes : 57.451 g 192.25 m 57.263 g 0 0 0
Times : 5:01:23 0:35:55 0:00:00 4:25:27
Speed : 93509 Bytes/sec.
Speed : 5.350 MegaBytes/min.
Ended : Fri Apr 16 05:54:23 2010
© Server Fault or respective owner