Are there any real benefits to including javascript dynamically rather than as script tags at the bo

Posted by SB on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by SB
Published on 2010-04-16T07:12:48Z Indexed on 2010/04/16 7:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 454

Filed under:

I've read that including the scripts dynamically may provide some better performance, however i'm not really seeing that on the small local tests I'm doing. I created a jquery plugin to dynamically load other plugins as necessary and am curious as to if this is actually a good idea. The following would be called onready or at the bottom of the page(I can provide the source for the plugin if anyone is interested):

  $.fn.executePlugin(
    'qtip',  // looks in default folder
    {
    required: '/javascript/plugin/easing.js',  // not really required for qtip just testing it
    version: 1,  //used for versioning and caching
    checkelement: '#thumbnail',  // will not include plugin if $(element).length==0
    css: 'page.css',  // include this css file as well with plugin
    cache:true,   // $.ajax will use cache:true
    success:function()  {  // success function to be called after the plugin loads - apply qtip to an element
        $('#thumbnail').qtip(
        {
        content: 'Some basic content for the tooltip', // Give it some content, in this case a simple string
        style: {name:'cream'},
        });                   

    }
});   

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about jquery-plugins