Is it a bad idea to hg update when your working copy has changes?
Posted
by allyourcode
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by allyourcode
Published on 2010-04-16T08:16:20Z
Indexed on
2010/04/16
8:23 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 186
mercurial
Seems like it would be better if you did commit followed by merge. I'm a little surprised update'ing is even allowed when your working copy has changes. Is this to avoid having commits that have two parents, which result from a merge?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner