Is it a bad idea to hg update when your working copy has changes?

Posted by allyourcode on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by allyourcode
Published on 2010-04-16T08:16:20Z Indexed on 2010/04/16 8:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 186

Filed under:

Seems like it would be better if you did commit followed by merge. I'm a little surprised update'ing is even allowed when your working copy has changes. Is this to avoid having commits that have two parents, which result from a merge?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about mercurial