Why methods in C# are not automatically virtual?

Posted by Alon on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Alon
Published on 2010-04-16T14:20:30Z Indexed on 2010/04/16 14:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 235

Filed under:
|

It would be much more less work to define which methods are NOT overideable instead of which are overideable because (at least for me), when you're designing a class, you don't care if its heirs will override your methods or not...

So, why methods in C# are not automatically virtual? What is the common sense in this?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c#

Related posts about virtual